• Home
  • BVSSH
  • C4E
  • Playbooks
  • Frameworks
  • Good Reads
Search

What are you looking for?

Standard : Learning is treated as progress

Purpose and Strategic Importance

This standard ensures teams view learning as a legitimate and valuable outcome. By recognising experiments, failed hypotheses, and customer insights as progress, teams reduce fear of failure and create a culture of continuous improvement.

It supports our policy "Learning as Progress". Without this focus, teams risk mistaking activity for success, leading to waste and frustration.

Strategic Impact

  • Encourages safe experimentation and innovation
  • Reduces waste by identifying ineffective ideas early
  • Builds resilience and adaptability through validated insights

Risks of Not Having This Standard

  • Teams pursue output volume over value
  • Repeated investment in ineffective solutions
  • Culture of fear and low psychological safety

CMMI Maturity Model

Level 1 – Initial

  • Learning outcomes are not tracked or valued

Level 2 – Managed

  • Some learning outcomes documented, often reactively

Level 3 – Defined

  • Teams define learning objectives alongside delivery goals

Level 4 – Quantitatively Managed

  • Learning outcomes measured and used to guide investment decisions

Level 5 – Optimising

  • Learning is institutionalised, shared across teams, and drives systemic improvement

Key Measures

  • % of initiatives with explicit learning objectives
  • Number of hypotheses validated or invalidated
  • Instances of pivots based on validated learning
Associated Policies
Associated Practices
  • Learning Backlogs

Technical debt is like junk food - easy now, painful later.

Awesome Blogs
  • LinkedIn Engineering
  • Github Engineering
  • Uber Engineering
  • Code as Craft
  • Medium.engineering